98
98
Oct 25, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 98
favorite 0
quote 0
obama. and he's had in the real clear politics.com average of recent polls but not by a wide margin. by 1%. i think in some ways some people said the debates hinged on style. i think basically what it did is bring back the basic fundamental so of this election. working for president obama is the sense that most americans have that they want to think well of the president, and i think in this case they feel that many people feel that it would be a bad thing for america to be seen rejecting the first black president. working for mitt romney is the idea that most people have not favored obama's signature programs, and most people are disappointed with the sluggish growth in the economy. i think we have a more fluid electorate than we had in 2004, comparison that's often made. karl rove back and said that only 7% of voters were changeable. scott rasmussen did a poll predebate what he looked at the number of people that said they were clear romney, clear obama. it was 42-41. that suggest somethin
obama. and he's had in the real clear politics.com average of recent polls but not by a wide margin. by 1%. i think in some ways some people said the debates hinged on style. i think basically what it did is bring back the basic fundamental so of this election. working for president obama is the sense that most americans have that they want to think well of the president, and i think in this case they feel that many people feel that it would be a bad thing for america to be seen rejecting the...
91
91
Oct 24, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 91
favorite 0
quote 0
that is my biggest concern with obama presidency. with respect to trying to solve the budget crisis, he is going to do so much more damage with obamacare being implemented. taxes going up because of the bush tax cuts being expired and more regulatory aggressiveness on his part. this economy is just going to crumble. >> ec regulatory issues that lay? >> well, we don't have enough time. [laughter] into the american public, the federal government uses too many regulations. absolutely. if you go in and talk to the public about the compelling parts of spending, should we spend less money on education -- no, that is her kids future. people with spending cuts or for her, but almost every individual spending cut. regulations spell out a number of regulations that they would change. during debates and other people have asked him to give them an idea of some regulations and they don't get specific. why? because most regulations are targeted. i will agree with rick that often regulations may exceed the power and often regulations are targeted,
that is my biggest concern with obama presidency. with respect to trying to solve the budget crisis, he is going to do so much more damage with obamacare being implemented. taxes going up because of the bush tax cuts being expired and more regulatory aggressiveness on his part. this economy is just going to crumble. >> ec regulatory issues that lay? >> well, we don't have enough time. [laughter] into the american public, the federal government uses too many regulations. absolutely....
124
124
Oct 26, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 124
favorite 0
quote 0
, one has obama, one has obama four to six and one hasn't even. sounds like obama is ahead three to four points. >> evin seven to probably split the difference. so, buy showing the shoe leather to kind of get a feel for where this is based on a high-quality research. >> would you recommend that people might recommend will get the state polls rather than national polls? >> 90% are robo or internet. >> when you see the cbs "new york times" that is a good policy. "the des moines register," julian also does the bloomberg poll. there are some high-quality people but it's very, very little and that is what pollutes the averages and whether it is pollster.com or politics dorwart with nate he's a really bright guy but you have to be more discriminating otherwise it is garbage in and garbage out. >> the last question before we go to yours we are in a choose your own adventure in the environment tell me your instinct. is it presumed that the mood remains a very close election do you think that the public at large on the losing side, whoever that may be is g
, one has obama, one has obama four to six and one hasn't even. sounds like obama is ahead three to four points. >> evin seven to probably split the difference. so, buy showing the shoe leather to kind of get a feel for where this is based on a high-quality research. >> would you recommend that people might recommend will get the state polls rather than national polls? >> 90% are robo or internet. >> when you see the cbs "new york times" that is a good policy....
106
106
Oct 24, 2012
10/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 106
favorite 0
quote 0
the obama administration has made some progress on this. they have come out and said that the united states does welcome and encourage chinese companies to directly invest in the united states and create jobs. when i talk to chinese companies, they say but the only policy we see is cfius, and that's blocking our investment. so on the u.s. side we do need to do more to clarify where those investments are welcome and where the riskings are higher, and where they are welcome, we need to create better policies to make those investments more attractive. i do a lot of work in clean energy. clean energy is really a sector where we could stand to use some chinese investment dollars and know-how because china is very strong, and there are a lot of investors that are very interested in the united states. but, for example, our investment incentive policies focus on tax rebates that aren't that useful for foreign firms. and we have a cfius policy that has recently brought in the department of energy and is focusing on the electricity grid as a potentia
the obama administration has made some progress on this. they have come out and said that the united states does welcome and encourage chinese companies to directly invest in the united states and create jobs. when i talk to chinese companies, they say but the only policy we see is cfius, and that's blocking our investment. so on the u.s. side we do need to do more to clarify where those investments are welcome and where the riskings are higher, and where they are welcome, we need to create...